Automation you can audit. Changes you can defend.
OperiProof builds assured network automation: pre-change analysis, exact-change approval, controlled execution, declared live observations, workflow-specific recovery, and evidence your team can verify.
Small carriers should not need a national operator's headcount to automate network changes safely.
Does our documented inventory match what is actually deployed?
When someone makes a production change, what is checked before it goes in?
If a change caused an outage tonight, how long until we knew, and how long to unwind it?
Teams generally know the answers are uncomfortable. What they lack is a defensible picture of how bad it is and what fixing it is worth — which is exactly what makes it impossible to get budget for.
We build assured network automation.
The automation does the work. The assurance makes the work defensible. The configuration that runs is bound by digest to the exact configuration your approver reviewed — a one-byte difference is refused before anything reaches the network. The evidence records what was proposed, validated, approved and executed, and what the declared post-change observations found. Its conclusions are limited to the stated workflow, controls, models, observations and protected invariants.
- Approved bytes and executed bytes bound by digest — a one-byte difference refuses
- SHA-256 manifest over every artifact
- Machine-readable data, with a generated human-readable report
- Cryptographic signature where a record must be verified outside your systems
How an OperiProof engagement works.
Qualification or Full Assessment
Start with one candidate workflow. Expand to three only when broader authority, source, risk, and architecture discovery is needed. Both end in a build, narrow, defer, or no-go decision.
Usable with or without us.
The Implementation
One qualified workflow engineered end to end, with pre-change validation, exact approval, controlled execution, declared post-change observations, workflow-specific recovery, evidence, and runbooks.
One workflow at a time. Never a platform rewrite.
Ongoing Assurance
Compatibility review, evidence review, recovery rehearsal, and bounded improvements after a real workflow establishes support demand.
Optional. Not a 24/7 NOC.
Your infrastructure. Your credentials. Your repositories.
Production automation is designed to run inside the customer security boundary. Access, credentials, support sessions and outbound destinations are customer-controlled, explicitly scoped and auditable.
Customer-specific work product, framework rights, offboarding and continued-operation terms are stated explicitly in the engagement agreement. The operating objective is customer custody, independent verification and no forced operational dependency.
Small rural and regional fiber carriers and ISPs.
Operators with lean engineering teams, recurring manual changes, active buildout, and workflows where one bounded automation improvement can show operational value quickly. OperiProof starts in Louisiana and the Gulf South and serves operators nationwide.
Lean network teams
Where senior engineers still carry repetitive operational work because broad platform programs are too large or risky.
Rural fiber growth
Where buildout, service activation, change volume, and evidence obligations are growing faster than engineering capacity.
Visible first workflow
A recurring change with a named owner, measurable outcome, protected behavior, and credible recovery path.
Customer-contained delivery
Automation, credentials, approvals, evidence, and operating knowledge remain inside the operator's boundary.
When a change goes wrong in production, how do you find out — and what does it cost to unwind it?
Thirty minutes, no charge, no deck. If the answer is comfortable, we will say so and there is no assessment to sell.